The Sixth Amendment guarantees the accused the right to a public trial and is aimed at creating transparency, fairness, and accountability.
The public trial right “is for the benefit of the accused; that the public may see he is fairly dealt with and not unjustly condemned and that the presence of interested spectators may keep his triers keenly alive to a sense of their responsibility and to the importance of their functions . . . .”
The public trial right, like the speedy trial right, was designed to protect the accused, but it also serves a public function. Public trials ensure that there's an extra layer of accountability as the public can determine whether government officials properly carry out their functions in a way that is not shrouded in secrecy.
In Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984), the Supreme Court laid out a four-part test to determine whether court closures are appropriate. According to the test, trial courts are to consider:
 the party seeking to close the [proceeding] must advance an overriding interest that is likely to be prejudiced,  the closure must be no broader than necessary to protect that interest,  the trial court must consider reasonable alternatives to closing the proceeding, and  it must make findings adequate to support the closure.
This approach mirrors the "strict scrutiny" analysis often seen in constitutional challenges to laws in which the government must advance a "compelling state interest" in order for it to be a constitutionally valid act. Additionally, in instances in which a court does grant closure, Presley v. Georgia, 558 U.S. 209 (2010) requires that, "the particular interest, and threat to that interest, must be articulated along with the findings specific enough that a reviewing court can determine whether the closure order was properly entered.”
The Sixth Amendment right to a public trial and the public's First Amendment right to access criminal proceedings have the common principle that courts should be open in order to ensure fairness. Nevertheless, there are instances in which courts have allowed some court proceedings to occur despite being fully or partially closed.
Public Trial Right Applies to:
REMEDY FOR VIOLATION
In Waller, the Court found that a public trial right violation a “structural error, i.e., an error entitling the defendant to automatic reversal without any inquiry into prejudice.” Id. at 59. In other words, once defendants demonstrate the violation, they are automatically entitled to relief.
If you are interested in obtaining Training and Technical Assistance (TTA) related to strengthening Sixth Amendment protections in your jurisdiction, click the link below.
|APPLY FOR TTA|
PUBLIC TRIAL RESOURCES
LAW REVIEW ARTICLES
OTHER LEGAL SOURCES
BLOGS, VIDEOS, WEBINARS, PODCASTS
Constitutional Conversation: 6th Amendment - Speedy Trial and Public Trial, Impartial Jury
Listen to scholars at James Madison's Montpelier discuss: How did the Founding Fathers define a speedy trial and why did they address how long it takes to have a trial? What is a public trial and how open should a trial be?